Who |
Motivation
for Change |
Pivotal
Event |
Assessment |
Action |
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe
(Frame-Maker) |
- New management brought in to take company to
next level .
|
- New VP / Eng wanted
insurance before committing to
schedule.
|
- Davenport Consulting assessed Engineering organization's ability to meet
product delivery commitments.
- Company had excellent technical capabilities but dangerous weaknesses
in estimating and QA.
|
- Led work breakdown and estimating effort to schedule the release.
- Introduced defect prediction metrics and Release Criteria.
- Project slipped by only 3 weeks over 9 months. (Even adding HTML during
Beta!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADP
(Pro- Business) |
- CTO wanted enhanced performance from Engineering, and had hired staff to
inculcate SEI CMM(I) practices.
|
- An important potential customer was dissatisfied with the organization's
ability to deliver product.
|
- Examined actual understanding and use of SEI CMM(I) key practices.
- Found too much time spent on slideware and complaining, too little on
making basic improvements.
|
- New expertise brought in to own the Product Lifecyle.
- SCM and Release Engineering practices brought up to industry best practices
and automated.
- Release dependability and quality soared, while build and release engineering
productivity increased fourfold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspirian |
- CEO wanted
trusted assessment of the company’s ability
to deliver on schedule, unhappy with problems he sensed from
finger-pointing.
|
- Board of Directors wanted due diligence prior to going for a new round
of funding.
|
- Assessment of an offshore Engineering organization's ability to keep its
product delivery commitments.
- Found that communication failures within senior management had the result
of hiding important problems from CEO.
|
- Showed that the probable delivery date was at least 6 months later
than the projected date.
- Rather than going for new funding, the Board shut the company down
and sold its technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMC
Software |
- Lack of synchronization between application development groups and
the platform development group.
- Product delivery cycles were too long.
- New Engineering groups were being acquired.
|
- New VP of Engineering wanted consistent way to appraise projects at key
common progress points.
|
- Determined engineering readiness for a common, iterative development methodology.
- Identified cultural and organizational impediments as well as critical
success factors.
|
- Created and led cross-functional core team in the definition and roll-out
of an Agile iterative methodology.
- Enabled assimilation of Marimba, Remedy, and Viadyne into a cohesive
engineering team in under 6 months.
- Reduced delivery horizons from 18+ months to <12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceridian
|
- Repeated failures to meet date commitments to customers in delivering
a major new product. (This was a huge project -- involving
more than 100 people across the U.S.)
|
- Executive Management needed to decide whether to re-organize the new initiative
or cancel it.
|
- Analysis to determine causes of inability to deliver new service offerings
after repeated schedule slips.
|
- Established
and led a cross-functional PMO in developing an integrated (and
realistic) project plan.
- Created monthly Critical Metrics Reports to show bottlenecks and inefficiencies
across the project, from Client Services set-up to P/R Technical Support.
- The re-organized initiative was launched and it succeeded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQE |
- CTO unhappy with problems of late deliveries, internal finger pointing.
- CTO wanted an unbiased, expert assessment of the SW group’s ability to
deliver reliable SW in the needed timeframe.
|
- New CTO hired to spin SW organization off into a separate company.
|
- Discovery of causes and analysis of software group's inability to meet
schedule commitments.
- “Archeology” and evaluation of software architecture.
|
- Showed the software group how to successfully defend its estimates
and how to report status so that progress became visible to
Exec Management.
- Uncovered and documented the product architecture so that the geographically
distributed development teams came to respect each other's work
and to collaborate to deliver on time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ford
Motor Co. |
- Ford's extensive quality improvement programs had resulted in increased operational
efficiencies across the board - except in IT.
|
- CIO for North American Operations demanded significant increase in IT
productivity.
-
- The Software Engineering Process Group (SEPG) had been unsuccessful in defining
metrics that the CIO could relate to.
|
- Analyzed effectiveness of communications between CIO and SEPG.
- Analyzed causes of resistance to metrics in the IT groups.
|
- Defined metrics that IT staff and CIO agreed effectively translated
IT work to IT productivity.
- Designed 18-month roll-out plan for the 5,000-strong IT organization,
and monitored it to successful completion.
- CIO's productivity targets were achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IBM |
- Senior management needed to improve profit margins.
|
- New system put in place to better track profitability revealed the
cost of troubled projects.
|
- Review of West Coast consulting projects.
- Defined early warning system for management by identifying:
- Hallmarks of successful projects.
- Pitfalls leading to troubled projects.
- Key indicators for executive management to monitor project.
|
- Changed how Services Management monitored and supported Project Managers'
efforts.
- Project success rates and profits increased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inxight
|
- The company's development resources are widely dispersed geographically; multiple
version control tools were used, and the SCm and build processes
were poorly understood.
|
- CVS administrator was leaving the company.
|
- Examined existing CVS admin practices and Release Engineering practices.
- Analyzed configuration of the code base in the CVS repository.
|
- Introduced regular and reliable CVS practices, enabling Inxight to cheaply
outsource CVS support.
- Re-organized the code base along component lines; identified and archived
obsolete code.
- Made it easier and faster for developers across teams to understand
their common apps and coordinate their work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integral
Systems |
- CEO was worried that the applications R&D group was not performing
as well as it should.
|
- An important Sales opportunity required making product commitments.
|
- Analyzed both the applications group and the R&D group responsible
for developing the platform that the applications were built
on.
- Used project data and industry averages to show that the true cause
of schedule slips was upstream – it was the quality of the platform
delivered to the apps group.
|
- Apps group was able to define and uphhold platform acceptance criteria,
so that overall schedule slips became visible earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberate |
- Company was missing its deadlines for delivering new products.
- Orders of existing products took far too long to ship, adversely impacting
customer satisfaction, company revenues and brand value.
|
- Important orders were lost or delayed by several weeks.
- VP of Sales escalated issues to CEO.
- New COO wanted clear picture of complex interdependencies across
the product range.
|
- Assessed product development process.
- Assessed release management and delivery processes.
- Modeled the order management value chain from sale through order entry,
pick list, packaging, and shipping.
|
- Implemented a closed-loop order management process -- owned by Sales Ops
-- that spanned Release Engineering, Legal and Finance to Shipping
and customer Support which reduced order fulfillment to 2 days.
- Created a “universal” product development process, with defined cross-functional
milestones, enabling true end-to-end project planning.
- Created a push-button build & release process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
QuestLink |
- Desire to integrate new acquisition as quickly and cost effectively
as possible.
|
- Board of Directors sensed potential problems with integration after
acquiring another company.
- Requested due diligence assessment.
|
- Identified strengths and weaknesses of potentially competing projects and
technologies in both companies (parent company and company it
was acquiring) to recommend integration strategies.
|
- Convinced Board that there was a significant difference in the two companies’
technologies and skills, averting a loss (lay-off) of crucial
company skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft |
- Company was expanding its Professional Services organization to support
Enterprise sales.
|
- Loss of several important Enterprise customers.
|
- Surveyed Professional Services managers across the country to analyze
project failures.
- Identified inadequate software skills staffing as well as inadequate command
of project management skills.
|
- Developed a prototype Project Management Bootcamp for the Education division.
|
Southern
Pacific |
- SP was negotiating to outsource its IT to IBM.
|
- SP and IBM needed to agree metrics to use in monitoring IT effectiveness
under the outsourcing agreement.
|
- Analyzed SP's business objectives for outsourcing.
- Assessed the IT organization's ability to collect and analyze metrics
data.
|
- Defined a hierarchy of measures that translated IT effort into achievable
business performance indicators to meet contractual requirements.
- Worked with functional managers to define their metrics collection, analyis
and reporting processes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spike
Source |
- This start-up hosts standard Linux stacks for its customers.
|
- CEO desired to assure scalability of build & test functions prior to
expanding.
|
- Mini-audit of the build and test environment at Spike Source.
|
- No action needed. The Spike Source build and test environment proves to be among
the very best we have ever seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSA |
- New CIO wanted
insurance before committing to business
viability of proposed spin-off.
|
- Plan to spin off IT as a software company.
|
- Assessment of Engineering organization's ability to deliver credible software
products.
|
- Showed that developing the necessary skills and technologies to transition
to an ISV would be too costly to support the business plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.
S. Dept of Commerce |
- The Department of Commerce Director who chaired Working Level Group
knew he lacked technical expertise and wanted an expert in the
field.
|
- U.S. and Japan entered into Joint Science and Technology agreement.
|
- Evaluated strengths and weaknesses in U.S. and Japanese technical capabilities
to support the Joint Agreement on Science and Technology.
|
- Identified Japanese technology areas of particular interest to the U.S.,
as well as U.S. technology areas to protect.
|
State of California Gov’t
Health /
Human Svcs.
|
- Quality issues with food stamp program.
|
- Federal audit with possibility of large penalties.
|
- Review of the processes used to maintain the food stamp application.
- Discovered insufficient rigor in testing and release management.
|
- Introduced full life cycle testing.
- Initiated a rigorous release management process.
- Over time, realised a significant reduction in food stamp defects -- from 14% to 2.5%.
|
Entertainment Conglomerate
|
- Business was not happy with the quality of services from IT.
|
- New VP of apps was appalled by lack of discipline, process and visibility into projects.
|
- Performed reviews of 6 key projects.
- Assessed basic “blocking and tackling” processes –Project Mgmt (PM), Quality Assurance (QA) and Service Request Mgmt (SR).
|
- In collaboration with client defined and implemented PM, QA and SR processes.
|
Property and Casualty Insurance
|
- Key project was behind schedule and over budget.
|
- CIO was concerned that the troubled project would not meet commitments being made to the business.
|
- Performed in-depth project review.
|
- Instituted formal project management processes.
- Established Project Steering Committee with business participation.
- Replaced project manager.
|
Health Insurance |
- Business desired to obtain more value from IT.
|
- CIO was under considerable pressure to deliver value to the business.
|
- Performed comprehensive review of methods, processes and organization.
- Assessed the organization using the SEI CMM model.
|
- Established new governance process to identify and focus on projects that deliver most value to organization.
- Began a transformation effort to attain higher levels of SEI CMM maturity.
|